What Is Employee Engagement and Why Does It Matter in Global HRM?
In
today’s hyper-connected global economy, organizations are increasingly realizing
that success isn’t driven by strategy alone it’s powered by people. One concept
gaining widespread attention is employee engagement. But what exactly
does it mean, and why is it critical in a global HRM context?
At
its core, employee engagement refers to the emotional commitment an
employee has towards their organization and its goals (Kahn, 1990). Engaged
employees don’t just show up they contribute enthusiastically, innovate
willingly, and go the extra mile. In a globalized workforce where diversity,
hybrid teams, and cultural complexity are the norm, fostering this level of
connection becomes both a strategic challenge and a necessity.
From
a theoretical perspective, engagement is closely tied to Strategic Human
Resource Management (SHRM), where HR isn’t just an administrative function
but a central force in achieving competitive advantage (Boxall & Purcell,
2008). In this framework, employee engagement becomes a strategic lever for
organizational performance, especially across borders.
Ulrich’s
(1997) HR Model reinforces this by positioning HR as a
business partner that helps align people practices with long-term business
goals. When engagement is embedded into global HR strategies through
initiatives like inclusive leadership, transparent communication, and cross-cultural
respect it leads to improved retention, productivity, and innovation.
Consider
Google as a real-world example. Known for its dynamic, inclusive, and
high-engagement culture, Google invests heavily in employee well-being,
empowerment, and autonomy across all its global offices. Its ability to adapt
engagement strategies to local cultures (e.g., respecting collectivist norms in
Asia) has been key to sustaining its global success.
However,
engagement is not a one-size-fits-all concept. Global HRM must consider factors
such as cultural values (Hofstede, 1980), legal environments, and
generational diversity. What motivates a millennial in Sri Lanka may differ
greatly from what drives an employee in Germany or Japan. That’s why globally
engaged companies must design flexible, culturally aware engagement frameworks.
To
conclude, employee engagement is more than a buzzword it’s a powerful tool in
the hands of strategic HR leaders. When applied effectively in global contexts,
it enhances organizational performance, supports cultural alignment, and
creates a workforce that thrives beyond borders.
References
Kahn,
W.A.
(1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at
work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), pp.692–724.
https://doi.org/10.5465/256287
Boxall,
P. and Purcell, J. (2008) Strategy and Human Resource
Management. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. https://www.macmillanihe.com/page/detail/Strategy-and-Human-Resource-Management/?K=9780230579354
Ulrich,
D.
(1997) Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and
Delivering Results. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. https://store.hbr.org/product/human-resource-champions-the-next-agenda-for-adding-value-and-delivering-results/7445
Hofstede,
G.
(2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and
Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/cultures-consequences/book9716
Google.
(2023) Workplace culture and employee engagement insights. [online]
Google Inc. https://about.google/intl/en/our-culture/
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFrom this article, I understand that integrating employee engagement in Human Resource Management is essential for building an agile, innovative workforce capable of meeting future challenges. Good Article
ReplyDelete